everyonedies:

dictatorboy:

My saint bernard lets the outside cats sleep with him

ARE YOU SERIOUS

wobbuffette:

geogonpal:

#FeministsAreUgly is trending on Twitter and there’s a huge amount of backlash trying to prove that feminists aren’t ugly and pointing to Beyoncé and other attractive ladies but like

A lot of feminists aren’t conventionally attractive and that’s okay

We’re allowed to be ugly

counter-activism that ends up actually proving the point on why it’s needed

awfffsome:

ueaq:

ueaq:

"NAME ONE THING THATS BETTER IN AMERICA THAN IN BRITAIN" 

image

image

I specially like that one that says you’re homophobic trash for not liking a show where none of the characters are gay.

frankoceanfanclub:

rosehip-baby:

I’ve watched this at least 200 times

please delete this

colormeradical:

micdotcom:

"[The] women that I portray in my art are all around, but society sees them as almost invisible.”

This is how David James, the Trinidadian mind behind BBW Art, explains his work. The portfolio is a stunning showcase of the beauty and versatility of curvy women.

SO THESE ARE FUCKING AWESOME

graceebooks:

pallet-town-julie-brown:

kateordie:

angelica-aswald:

mtvstyle:

want this moment burned on my eyelids

So many girls saw this. Bless.

All hail the queen.

Let this sink in. She declared herself a feminist in front of a bunch of white women who decided they werent feminists like katy perry and then her husband and child, the things feminists evidently don’t have, were cheering on and gave her an award

i can’t help but find it incredibly ironic and telling that the people everyone seems to be getting the most life out of beyoncé presumably giving the finger to with her strong declaration of feminism last night are other women. how about letting it sink in that she declared herself a feminist in front of a bunch of sexist and misogynistic men who make up our patriarchal music industry?

with-grace-and-guts:

Billy Jack Brawner III via Instagram

emeraaldnymph:

human-timelord-metacrisis:

glitterist:

feahrs:

gazeonmy:

tommyoliverblogs:

hirosashii:

micthemicrophone:

Damn.

WOW

FUCK

SHIT

Wow

this

just had to

this is why i love banksy. 

image

i mean do you see this shit

image

this stuff is deep

image

i mean if he grafittis on your building your property value actually goes up

image

holy

image

mother

image

of

image

fuck

image

image

image

I’ve been saying this for a while now. This art is amazing

definitelydope:

By Agata Serge

a-little-melancholy:

chaz-gelf:

sixmilliondeadinternets:

Gandhi has been historically the most aggressive character in Civilization due to an original bug in the first game that caused him to go all-out once he reaches democracy. They just kept the thing going ever since.

To further explain this bug, because I was chatting with mothmonarch about Civilization and other strategy games last night and I never got around to explaining this fully, but I love this story:

Gandhi’s AI in the original game had its aggression set to the absolute minimum (0 on a scale of 0 to 10, I believe, I may have this wrong but the basic idea I’m about to explain is accurate, as far as I can tell). Adopting democracy lowers an AI civ’s aggression by 2 points, so when someone who is fully peaceful loses two points of aggression, they should still be nice and polite, right?

Except this is an old DOS game, and so computer math is in place. What actually happened was that Gandhi’s aggression level ticked backwards two steps, from 0 to 255On a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.

And that’s the story as I recall it, but again I may have gotten some details wrong, so feel free to correct me! After that, as the original poster said, the devs loved the bug so much that they just kept it in as a running joke!

On a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.”

I about pissed myself laughing at this.